<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for LocalGovChat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://localgovchat.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://localgovchat.com</link>
	<description>For PR Pros Doing a Little Bit, er, a Lot of Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 07:01:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tweeting from the Frontline and &#8216;Jumping the Queue&#8217; &#8211; Tonight on #localgovchat at 9 pm EST by Mariateresa</title>
		<link>http://localgovchat.com/2010/04/21/tweeting-from-the-frontline-and-jumping-the-queue-tonight-on-localgovchat-at-9-pm-est/#comment-311</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mariateresa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 07:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localgovchat.com/?p=68#comment-311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nitin (WP won&#8217;t let me post this below your reply&#8230; only so many lveles i guess),Actually,My point is to say &#8220;don&#8217;t engage in customer service, engage for other purposes&#8221;.I don&#8217;t believe that customer service can be delivered 140 chars at the time.  Nor do I believe they (the people adopting Twitter for it) are trying.  I think it is becoming an escalation tool for pushing problems to other channels (email, phone, etc.) and that is simply fine.Monitoring any channel for potential problems and feedback is absolutely necessary.  And it does raise the profile of the company.  However, it is not customer service &#8211; it is branding.  And it is good.I am concerned, and I said that before, that when the novelty wear off customers will raise or have high expectations that are not possible to deliver against.Solving a problem 140 characters at the time is not possible, as most problem statement, clarification questions, solutions, answers, etc. are already longer than that.I just want to raise the flag and say &#8220;be careful of what you promise, you will have to deliver&#8221;.  Most vendors and organizations are rushing without an idea or strategy and that is foolish.  We have detailed knowledge of what happens when they do that.  And, as I said in the post,if you rush you will fail.Thanks for the discussion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nitin (WP won&#8217;t let me post this below your reply&#8230; only so many lveles i guess),Actually,My point is to say &#8220;don&#8217;t engage in customer service, engage for other purposes&#8221;.I don&#8217;t believe that customer service can be delivered 140 chars at the time.  Nor do I believe they (the people adopting Twitter for it) are trying.  I think it is becoming an escalation tool for pushing problems to other channels (email, phone, etc.) and that is simply fine.Monitoring any channel for potential problems and feedback is absolutely necessary.  And it does raise the profile of the company.  However, it is not customer service &#8211; it is branding.  And it is good.I am concerned, and I said that before, that when the novelty wear off customers will raise or have high expectations that are not possible to deliver against.Solving a problem 140 characters at the time is not possible, as most problem statement, clarification questions, solutions, answers, etc. are already longer than that.I just want to raise the flag and say &#8220;be careful of what you promise, you will have to deliver&#8221;.  Most vendors and organizations are rushing without an idea or strategy and that is foolish.  We have detailed knowledge of what happens when they do that.  And, as I said in the post,if you rush you will fail.Thanks for the discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DC Fire Communications Director @wallscomm says &#8220;Social Media is for parties.&#8221; So Let&#8217;s Party! by rupertmike</title>
		<link>http://localgovchat.com/2011/09/22/dc-fire-communications-director-wallscomm-says-social-media-is-for-parties-so-lets-party/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rupertmike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localgovchat.com/?p=289#comment-212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kim,
Thanks for the great comment. You&#039;re post was awesome! Hopefully we&#039;ve caused DC Fire officials to rethink their strategy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kim,<br />
Thanks for the great comment. You&#8217;re post was awesome! Hopefully we&#8217;ve caused DC Fire officials to rethink their strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DC Fire Communications Director @wallscomm says &#8220;Social Media is for parties.&#8221; So Let&#8217;s Party! by Kim Stephens</title>
		<link>http://localgovchat.com/2011/09/22/dc-fire-communications-director-wallscomm-says-social-media-is-for-parties-so-lets-party/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim Stephens]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localgovchat.com/?p=289#comment-211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is so awesome. I smiled the entire time I&#039;m read it with one thought in my head &quot;YEA!&quot;.  Thanks for the link, glad I had a small part in this great piece! 
Kim]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so awesome. I smiled the entire time I&#8217;m read it with one thought in my head &#8220;YEA!&#8221;.  Thanks for the link, glad I had a small part in this great piece!<br />
Kim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DC Fire Communications Director @wallscomm says &#8220;Social Media is for parties.&#8221; So Let&#8217;s Party! by DC Fire Communications Director @wallscomm says “Social Media is for parties.” So Let’s Party! &#124; GovTwit</title>
		<link>http://localgovchat.com/2011/09/22/dc-fire-communications-director-wallscomm-says-social-media-is-for-parties-so-lets-party/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DC Fire Communications Director @wallscomm says “Social Media is for parties.” So Let’s Party! &#124; GovTwit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localgovchat.com/?p=289#comment-210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The following post is republished here with permission from LocalGovChat.com&#8217;s Mike Rupert. I was just so flabbergasted to read the story and so impressed with Mike&#8217;s response that I wanted to share. His original post appears here. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The following post is republished here with permission from LocalGovChat.com&#8217;s Mike Rupert. I was just so flabbergasted to read the story and so impressed with Mike&#8217;s response that I wanted to share. His original post appears here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DC Fire Communications Director @wallscomm says &#8220;Social Media is for parties.&#8221; So Let&#8217;s Party! by rupertmike</title>
		<link>http://localgovchat.com/2011/09/22/dc-fire-communications-director-wallscomm-says-social-media-is-for-parties-so-lets-party/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rupertmike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localgovchat.com/?p=289#comment-209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for comment Jay!
Totally agree. Dismissing a service/tool because you don&#039;t  want to or are unwilling to understand is unacceptable and potentially dangerous.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for comment Jay!<br />
Totally agree. Dismissing a service/tool because you don&#8217;t  want to or are unwilling to understand is unacceptable and potentially dangerous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DC Fire Communications Director @wallscomm says &#8220;Social Media is for parties.&#8221; So Let&#8217;s Party! by Jay Carmona</title>
		<link>http://localgovchat.com/2011/09/22/dc-fire-communications-director-wallscomm-says-social-media-is-for-parties-so-lets-party/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay Carmona]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localgovchat.com/?p=289#comment-208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was widely reported that news of the DC Earthquake via Twitter actually reached New York before the quake (this was confirmed by analytics reporting). In an earthquake, even 10-15 seconds is important. It was also the fastest news service back up and running for those of us who evacuated directly after the earthquake. Public servants do the public a disservice by dismissing the media avenues an overwhealming amount of them use--every day. Kudos to Mike for putting this together.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was widely reported that news of the DC Earthquake via Twitter actually reached New York before the quake (this was confirmed by analytics reporting). In an earthquake, even 10-15 seconds is important. It was also the fastest news service back up and running for those of us who evacuated directly after the earthquake. Public servants do the public a disservice by dismissing the media avenues an overwhealming amount of them use&#8211;every day. Kudos to Mike for putting this together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Four Things Pick-Up Basketball Teaches You About Social Media, PR. Seriously. #localgovchat #gov20 by Reginald Jackson</title>
		<link>http://localgovchat.com/2011/05/03/four-things-pick-up-basketball-teaches-you-about-social-media-pr-seriously-localgovchat-gov20/#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reginald Jackson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 05:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localgovchat.com/?p=256#comment-199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very interesting article. I can relate to the goofy looking dude who came by himself. Because that&#039;s who I always get!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting article. I can relate to the goofy looking dude who came by himself. Because that&#8217;s who I always get!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tonight on #localgovchat: Does gov need more tech &#8211; social or otherwise &#8211; to improve customer service or just better people? by Reginald Jackson</title>
		<link>http://localgovchat.com/2011/04/27/tonight-on-localgovchat-does-gov-need-more-tech-social-or-otherwise-to-improve-customer-service-or-just-better-people/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reginald Jackson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 05:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localgovchat.com/?p=254#comment-198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To me having good customer service anywhere is about getting people who are truly professionals.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me having good customer service anywhere is about getting people who are truly professionals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tonight on #localgovchat: Does gov need more tech &#8211; social or otherwise &#8211; to improve customer service or just better people? by Paul Davis</title>
		<link>http://localgovchat.com/2011/04/27/tonight-on-localgovchat-does-gov-need-more-tech-social-or-otherwise-to-improve-customer-service-or-just-better-people/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Davis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 19:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localgovchat.com/?p=254#comment-177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wish I&#039;d been able to participate in this one, as it&#039;s a cogent topic.  I think many of the providers of &quot;gov 2.0&quot; solutions are missing a larger issue.  Too many of the technologies currently being touted are driven by those looking to disrupt government in the name of “progress”.  

It&#039;s not only about transparency.  Any truly effective technologies for citizen engagement with government also need to recognize the realities facing resource- and cash-strapped government teams.  Interacting with local government to request repair of a broken traffic light, question a planned housing development, or complain about neighborhood blight is of little value if the government isn’t equipped to process and respond to the flood of requests that social media can engender.   Many social media solutions merely mimic the &quot;old-school&quot; telephone and e-mail methods of getting government&#039;s attention: dumping a request or demand into a large hole.  The easier and faster the ability for citizens to make requests, the harder it will be for government to manage and prioritize them all.  

The new crop of solutions needs to help governments effectively route requests to the right people and prioritize which issues are creating the biggest stir among the public.  For example, a pothole that spurs a thousand requests for repair would clearly be causing more public pain than one that elicits only a handful – and repair crews can be deployed accordingly.  

Gov 2.0 social media and other mobility solutions need to be about more than citizens saying &quot;meet my needs!  pay attention to me!&quot;.  They also need to help government employees do more with less and prioritize in an era when trade-offs, band-aids and tough choices may be the only options many governments have.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wish I&#8217;d been able to participate in this one, as it&#8217;s a cogent topic.  I think many of the providers of &#8220;gov 2.0&#8243; solutions are missing a larger issue.  Too many of the technologies currently being touted are driven by those looking to disrupt government in the name of “progress”.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not only about transparency.  Any truly effective technologies for citizen engagement with government also need to recognize the realities facing resource- and cash-strapped government teams.  Interacting with local government to request repair of a broken traffic light, question a planned housing development, or complain about neighborhood blight is of little value if the government isn’t equipped to process and respond to the flood of requests that social media can engender.   Many social media solutions merely mimic the &#8220;old-school&#8221; telephone and e-mail methods of getting government&#8217;s attention: dumping a request or demand into a large hole.  The easier and faster the ability for citizens to make requests, the harder it will be for government to manage and prioritize them all.  </p>
<p>The new crop of solutions needs to help governments effectively route requests to the right people and prioritize which issues are creating the biggest stir among the public.  For example, a pothole that spurs a thousand requests for repair would clearly be causing more public pain than one that elicits only a handful – and repair crews can be deployed accordingly.  </p>
<p>Gov 2.0 social media and other mobility solutions need to be about more than citizens saying &#8220;meet my needs!  pay attention to me!&#8221;.  They also need to help government employees do more with less and prioritize in an era when trade-offs, band-aids and tough choices may be the only options many governments have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on So what is this #localgovchat thingy? by Does #localgov know how to market? Do we need help? Tonight on #localgovchat. &#171; LocalGovChat</title>
		<link>http://localgovchat.com/2010/03/03/so-what-is-this-localgovchat-thingy/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Does #localgov know how to market? Do we need help? Tonight on #localgovchat. &#171; LocalGovChat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 16:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localgovchat.com/?p=42#comment-154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] us tonight on #localgovchat at 9 EST. Not sure how? Read this.   from &#8594; Uncategorized    &#8592; No #localgovchat tonight. Duty calls. Back next week!   [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] us tonight on #localgovchat at 9 EST. Not sure how? Read this.   from &rarr; Uncategorized    &larr; No #localgovchat tonight. Duty calls. Back next week!   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

